POSTMODERN INTERCULTURAL COMMUNICATION: BEYOND NATIONAL AND ETHNIC IDENTITIES

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46991/AFA/2022.18.1.090

Keywords:

modernism, postmodernism, communication, interculturality, multiculturalism, identity, ethnicity

Abstract

New modes of communication gradually emerged at the end of the 20th century, shifting the focus of attention from national and ethnic criteria to the more complex and multifarious ones suggested by the intercultural paradigm. This shift parallels the global tendency to move away from univocal, modernist perspectives to the more complex, and ambiguous postmodern ones. Downplaying the role of fixed national or ethnic identities in the communication process, and refusing simplifications and generalizations to emphasize instead fluidity and complexity, this new paradigm has had consequences on the lives of sub-groups and minorities, and on the communication process as a whole.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bauman, Z. (2000). Liquid modernity. London. Polity Press.

Bauman, Z. (2004). Identity. London. Polity Press.

Bauman, Z. (2006). Liquid times: living in an age of uncertainty. London. Polity Press.

Chemillier-Gendreau, M. (2013). De la guerre à la communauté universelle. Paris. Fayard.

Dervin, F. (2011). Impostures interculturelles. Paris. L’Harmattan.

Hall, E.T. (1959). The silent language. New York. Anchor Books.

Hall, E.T. (1966). The hidden dimension. New York. Anchor Books.

Hall, E.T. (1976). Beyond culture. New York. Anchor Books.

Halpern, C. (2004). Communautarisme, une notion équivoque. Sciences Humaines, 148, 4.

Hofstede, G. (2003). Culture’s consequences: comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations. London: Sage.

Hofstede, G. (1997). Cultures and organizations: sof the mind. intercultural cooperation and its importance for survival. London: McGraw-Hill.

Holliday, A., Hyde M., & Kullman J. (Eds.) (2010). Intercultural communication: an advanced resource book. London: Routledge.

Huntington, S. (1996). The clash of civilizations and the remaking of the world order. New York: Simon and Schuster.

Kramsch, C. (1993). Context and culture in language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Laplantine, F. (1999). Je, nous et les autres. Paris: Le Pommier.

McSweeney, B. (2002). Hofstede’s model of national cultural differences and their consequences: A Triumph Of Faith – A Failure Of Analysis, Human Relations, 55(1), 89-118.

Nakayama, Thomas K., & Rona Tamiko, H. (Eds). (2010). The handbook of critical intercultural communication. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.

Simmel, G. (1908). The Stranger. Georg Simmel: on individuality and social forms. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Sumner, W.G. (2007). Folkways: A study of the sociological importance of usages, manners, customs, mores, and morals [1906]. New York. Cosimo Classics.

Trompenaars, F., & Woolliams, P. (2004) Business across cultures. Chicago: Capstone Publishers.

Trotman, J. (2002). Multiculturalism: roots and realities. Bloomington: IN. Indiana University Press.

Downloads

Published

2022-06-01

How to Cite

Chastagner, C. (2022). POSTMODERN INTERCULTURAL COMMUNICATION: BEYOND NATIONAL AND ETHNIC IDENTITIES. Armenian Folia Anglistika, 18(1 (25), 90–100. https://doi.org/10.46991/AFA/2022.18.1.090

Issue

Section

Culture Studies