GENDER DIFFERENCES IN VERBAL AND NONVERBAL AGGRESSION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46991/AFA/2023.19.1.057Keywords:
communicative aggression,, verbal and non-verbal aggression,, political debate, political leaders.Abstract
Gender differences permeate every aspect of human personality and appearance, and dictate how men and women should act, think and behave. Gender embodies a pattern of relations that evolves over time to define male and female, masculinity and femininity, concurrently structuring and regulating people’s relation to society. Gender decides what is expected, permitted and valued in a woman or a man in a given context. This paper discusses male and female aggression in political debates with a special focus on the recent debate held on 9th September 2021 in Canada. The analyses carried out through the methods of content, discourse and pragmalinguistic analyses, show that aggression is frequently categorized as a social behavior, and thus falls within a set of criteria depending on the roles that people occupy. In the world today, there is an increase in the use of communicative aggression, both verbal and non-verbal in the political arena. Aggression is widely applied in political communication where the main purpose is to fight the opponent and get the attention of the audience and voters. Male politicians are expected to be verbally and non-verbally more aggressive than women while female politicians perceived as less aggressive and considered to be better performers. However, this assumption remains an area of contention.
Downloads
References
Ames, D. L., & Fiske, S.T. (2013). International harms are worse, even when they’re not. Psychological Science, 24 (9), 1755-1762.
Anderson, C. A., & Bushman, B. J. (2002). Human aggression. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 27–51.
Baron, R. A., & Richardson, D. R. (1994). Human aggression. New York: Plenum Press.
Bandwart, M. C. (2010). Gender and candidate communication: Effects of stereotypes in the 2008 election. American Behavioral Scientist, 54, 265–283.
Boussalis, C., Coan, T., Holman, M., & Müller, S. (2021). Gender, candidate emotional expression, and voter reactions during televised debates. American Political Science Review, 115 (4), 1242-1257.
Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. London: Routledge.
Carli, L. (2001). Gender and social influence. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 725–741.
Crick, N. R., & Grotpeter, J. K. (1995). Relational aggression, gender, and social-psychological adjustment. Child Development, 66 (3), 710-722.
Dumitrescu, D. (2016). Nonverbal communication in politics: A review of research developments, 2005–2015. American Behavioral Scientist, 60 (14), 1656–1675.
Grebelsky-Lichtman, T., & Katz, R. (2020). Gender effect on political leaders’ nonverbal communicative structure during the COVID-19 crisis. International Journal of Environment Research and Public Health, 17, 7776-7789.
Grebelsky-Lichtman, T. (2015). The role of verbal and nonverbal behavior in televised political debates, Journal of Political Marketing, 15 (4), 362–387. https://doi.org/10.1080/15377857.2014.959688
Grebelsky-Lichtman, T. (2010). The relationship of verbal and nonverbal behavior to political stature: The political interviews of Israel’s Prime Minister Ariel Sharon. Journal of Political Marketing,9 (4), 229–253.
Jordan-Jackson, F., Yang, L., Rancer, A., & Infante, D. (2008). Perceptions of males’ and females’ use of affirming and non-affirming messages in an interpersonal dispute: You’ve Come a Long Way Baby?” Western Journal of Communication, 72, 239–258.
Knyazyan A, (2016). Male and female profanity in English anecdotes. Armenian Folia Anglistika, 12 (2), 27–37.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.46991/AFA/2016.12.2.027
Lau, R., & Pomper, G. (2004). Negative campaigning: An analysis of U.S. Senate elections. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
Nau, C., & Stewart, C. (2018). Effects of gender and verbal aggression on perceptions of U.S. political speakers. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict, 6 (1), 127–148.
Wasike, B. (2019). Gender, nonverbal communication, and televised debates: a case study analysis of Clinton and Trump’s nonverbal language during the 2016 Town Hall debate. International Journal of Communication, 13, 251–276.
Sources of Data
Carpenter, L. (2021). Did Green Party leader Annamie Paul win last night’s debate? In Cult. Retrieved January 10, 2022.
Syed, F. (2021). Annamie Paul was the unexpected hero of the leaders' debate. In Maclean’s. Retrieved January 05, 2022.
Boisvert, N. (2021, Jun 16). Green Leader Annamie Paul says attempt to force her out driven by racism, sexism. In CBC News. Retrieved January 10, 2022.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Author(s)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.