The Semantic-Pragmatic Characteristics of the Discource of Praise

Authors

  • Narine Gasparyan Yerevan State University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46991/BYSU:B/2024.15.3.099

Keywords:

speech act, praise, self-praise, positive assessment, perlocutive result, communicative purpose, intention, addressee

Abstract

One of the means of expressing encouragement is praise. Praise is a sincere positive evaluation of the addressee or a third person, whether  he is present or not in the course of the communication. While praising the addressee or a third person for their actions, praise addressers highly explicit their own emotive state or the emotive attitude towards the facts of speech.

Praise is considered a positive evaluative speech act and part of a communication negotiation strategy. When we praise a person, we can motivate them to achieve their goal or dream.

Praise is an illocutionary act, which implies the manifestation of the purposefulness of the speech act and expresses the sincere attitude of the speaker towards the interlocutor. The implementation of this act is conditioned by the different status and role characteristics of the communicators.

The purpose of the article is to present the semantic and pragmatic peculiarities of speech acts expressing praise.

Author Biography

Narine Gasparyan, Yerevan State University

Candidate of Philological Sciences, Associate Professor at YSU Chair of English
Philology, Assistant

References

Wierzbicka, A. English Speech Act Verbs: A Semantic Dictionary. Sydney: Academic Press, 1987, 397p.: 199

Карасик В.И. Язык социального статуса. М.: Институт языкознания РАН, 1992,330 с.:3

Горелов И.Н., Седов К.Ф.Основы психолингвистики. М.: Лабиринт, 2001, 303 с.:121

Петелина Е.С. Прагматические особенности высказываний положительной оценки. Автореферат дис. канд. филол. наук. Пятигорск, 1986, 15с.:7

Collins J. Hollywood Husbands. US: Pocket Books, 1986, 536p.

Fitzgerald F. S. Selected Short Stories. Moscow: Progress Publishers, 1979, 360 p.

Grisham J. The Firm. N.Y.: Island Books, 1991, 502 p.

Williams T. The Night of the Iguana // Three by Tennessee. N.Y.: Times Mirror, 1976, p. 9-127

Lawrence D.H The Plumed Serpent. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books, 1977, 462p.

O’Neill E. The Great God Brown // Nine Plays by E. O’Neill. New York: Random House, 1954, p. 307-381.

Shaw B. Caesar and Cleopatra // Shaw. B. Selected Works. Plays. Selections from Criticism. M.; Foreign languages Publishing House, 1958, p. 229-552.

Fitzgerald F. S. Babylon Revisited / Selected Short Stories. Moscow: Progress Publishers, 1979, 360 p

Maugham W.S. Theatre. Moscow: Vyssaya Skola, 1985, 224 p.

Пиотровская Л. А. Эмотивные высказывания как объект лингвистического исследования: Монография. СПб.: Изд-во С.-Петерб. ун-та, 1994, 146 с. 51-52.

Leech G.N. Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman, 1983, p 132.

Christie A. Hercule Poirot’s Christmas. L.: Harper Collins Publishers, 1993, 210p.

Stone K. Roommates. N.Y.: Zebra Books, 1987, 569 p.

Michael J. Private Affairs. N.Y.: Poseidon Press, 1986, 554 p.

Maugham W. S. The Razor’s Edge. N. Y.: Vintage International, 2003, 314 p.

Lawrence D.H The Plumed Serpent. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books, 1977, 462p.

Wilder T. The Cabala //Wilder T. Selected Works. Moscow: Raduga Publishers, 1988, p. 25 - 286

Падучева Е.В. Высказывание и его отношение к действительности. М Наука, 1985, 271 с.:58

Published

2024-11-11

How to Cite

Gasparyan, N. (2024). The Semantic-Pragmatic Characteristics of the Discource of Praise. Bulletin of Yerevan University B: Philology, 15(3 (45), 99–110. https://doi.org/10.46991/BYSU:B/2024.15.3.099

Issue

Section

Linguistics