Neoclassical Realism and Armenia’s International Orientation: An Attempt to Determine Patterns or Mechanisms of their Application?

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46991/JOPS/2024.3.7.070

Keywords:

Armenia, neoclassical realism, small states, national security, globalization, international orientation, European Union

Abstract

The article examines neoclassical realism and Armenia’s international orientation as one of the directions in the transformation of the theory of international relations of small states. In this article, neoclassical realism is analyzed from the point of view of subjective aspects of policy formation and the influence of domestic political features of a small state on its foreign policy. Taking into account that neoclassical realism is a completely independent development of neorealism with a complementary elemental level of analysis of international politics. In terms of content, neoclassical realism of Armenia clarifies such concepts as resilience, national security, balance of power, balancing policy and others. The neoclassical model of Armenia’s foreign policy as a small state allows us to study the conditions under which great powers and small states deviate from the policy of balancing. From this point of view, the article proposes to analyze international politics through the prism of a global rollback to state-centric politics. The article takes into account that globalization presents new challenges for small countries such as Armenia, which risks being marginalized as a result of the restructuring of both global and regional economic relations.

Author Biography

Dachi Korinteli, Ilia State University

Master’s Degree in International Relations from the Ilia State University.

References

Alden, Chris, Amnon Aran, and Ana Cristina Alves. 2016. Foreign Policy Analysis: New approaches (2nd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315442488.

Grigoryan, Armen. 2021. The Armenian revolution: a mishandled opportunity. July 5, 2021. Accessed Fabruary 20, 2024. https://neweasterneurope.eu/2021/07/05/the-armenian-revolution-a-mishandled-opportunity/.

Haindrava, Ivlian. 2022. Armenia at the crossroads: Expert Opinion 195. Tbilisi: Georgian Foundation For strategic and International Studies. Accessed Fabruary 20, 2024. https://gfsis.org.ge/files/library/opinion-papers/195-expert-opinion-eng.pdf.

Iskandaryan, Alexander, Hrant mikaelian, and Sergey Minasyan. 2016. War, business and politics: Informal networks and formal InstItutIons in ArmenIa. Yerevan: Caucasus Institute. Accessed Fabruary 20, 2024. https://c-i.am/wp-content/uploads/Informal-networks_the-book.pdf.

Khvorostiankina, Anna. 2018. “Europeanization Through EU External Agreements and the Issue of ‘Constitutional Identity’: The Case of the EU-Armenia CEPA”. Kyiv-Mohyla Law and Politics Journal 4 (December): 15-52. https://doi.org/10.18523/kmlpj153250.2018-4.15-52.

Rose, Gideon. 1998. “Neoclassical Realism and Theories of Foreign Policy.” World Politics 51 (1) (October): 144-177.

Terzyan, Aram 2017. “The EU vs. Russia in the foreign policy discourse of Armenia: the fragility of normative power or the power of Russian coercion?.” Eastern Journal of European Studies 8: 185-203.

Vasilyan, Syuzanna. 2020. “Moral Power” of the EU through its Regionalization Policy in the South Caucasus. In: 'Moral Power' of the European Union in the South Caucasus. Palgrave Macmillan, London, pp. 119-156. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-60198-8_4.

Downloads

Published

2024-09-09

How to Cite

Korinteli, D. (2024). Neoclassical Realism and Armenia’s International Orientation: An Attempt to Determine Patterns or Mechanisms of their Application?. Journal of Political Science: Bulletin of Yerevan University, 3(1(7), 70–86. https://doi.org/10.46991/JOPS/2024.3.7.070

Issue

Section

Geopolitics