Transformation of Modern Wars in the South Caucasus: Azerbaijan's Hybrid War Against Artsakh

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46991/JOPS/2024.3.7.010

Keywords:

Hybrid war, Artsakh, Azerbaijan, Armenia, Strategy, Ethnic Cleansing

Abstract

The Third Artsakh war has dramatically transformed the security environment in the South Caucasus. Being a result and indicator of changing world order, it unleashed the parameters of the newly-developing formats of conflicts, confrontations, and wars, called hybrid warfare. From this perspective the paper studies the parameters of hybrid warfare against Artsakh launched by Azerbaijan. Application of hybrid warfare against Artsakh is not a new phenomenon and has being practiced by Azerbaijan at least during the last 10-15 years. However, the results of the 44-day war has provided new framework, opportunities, and instruments to intensify hybrid operations, striving to maximize the results.

Hence, the paper discusses the Azerbaijani strategy of hybrid war against Artsakh by analyzing the main strategies, tactics, instruments and tools used by Azerbaijan against Artsakh, specifically, after 44-day war.

The paper argues that after the Third Artsakh war of 2020 Azerbaijan has launched a full scale hybrid operation to provide ethnic cleansing of Artsakh and receive ‘Nagorno-Karabakh without Armenians’. The operation was based on the following components: information-psychological campaign/influence operations (against Armenians in Artsakh), economic and energy aspects, ecological issues, blockade, international campaigns, support to split Armenian power (in Armenia and Armenian Diaspora), sabotage against critical infrastructure and population, and so on. Concluding the paper launches, a discussion about Azerbaijani engagement with Armenia after the ethnic cleansing of Artsakh of Autumn of 2023.

Author Biography

Ruben Elamiryan, Public Administration Academy of the Republic of Armenia

PhD in Political Science, Associate Professor of the Chair Psychology and Political Science at Public Administration Academy of the Republic of Armenia

References

Amnesty International. 2023. “Azerbaijan: Blockade of Lachin corridor putting thousands of lives in peril must be immediately lifted.” Accessed April 25, 2024. https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2023/02/azerbaijan-blockade-of-lachin-corridor-putting-thousands-of-lives-in-peril-must-be-immediately-lifted/.

ARMENPRESS. 2024. “Joint Russian-Turkish monitoring center in Nagorno-Karabakh to stop its activity.” April 18, 2024. Accessed April 25, 2024. https://armenpress.am/eng/news/1135088/.

Azatutyun.am. 2023. “Longer Power Cuts Imposed In Karabakh. Azatutyun Radio Station.” January 16, 2023. Accessed April 25, 2024. https://www.azatutyun.am/a/32225894.html.

Ceasefire Agreement. 1994. Minister of Defense of Azerbaijan, Minister of Defense of Armenia, and Nagorno Karabakh Army Commander. “The text was signed respectively by M. Mamedov in Baku on May 9, S. Sargsyan in Yerevan on May 10, S. Babayan in Stepanakert on May 11, 1994.” Accessed April 25, 2024. https://www.peaceagreements.org/viewmasterdocument/990.

Cîrdei, Ionut Alin. 2017. “The Hybrid Warfare in the 21St Century: An Old Concept with a New Face.” International conference KNOWLEDGE-BASED ORGANIZATION 23 (1): 74-78. https://doi.org/10.1515/kbo-2017-0011.

Connable, Ben. 2017. “Redesigning Strategy for Irregular War: Improving Strategic Design for Planners and Policymakers to Help Defeat Groups Like the Islamic State.” RAND Corporation. Accessed April 25, 2024. https://www.rand.org/pubs/working_papers/WR1172.html.

Council on Foreign Relations. 2024. “Nagorno-Karabakh Conflict by the Center for Preventive Action.” March 20, 2024. Accessed April 25, 2024. https://www.cfr.org/global-conflict-tracker/conflict/nagorno-karabakh-conflict.

Cullen, Patrick J. and Erik Reichborn-Kjennerud. 2017. “MCDC Countering Hybrid Warfare Project: Understanding Hybrid Warfare.” Accessed April 25, 2024. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5a8228a540f0b62305b92caa/dar_mcdc_hybrid_warfare.pdf.

Elamiryan, Ruben. 2022. “The US, Strategic Environment in the South Caucasus and Armenia: A Sight on the Future”. Journal of Political Science: Bulletin of Yerevan University 1 (3): 25-35. https://doi.org/10.46991/JOPS/2022.1.3.025.

Grigoryan, Tigran. 2022. “The referendum on joining Russia will not bring any practical benefit to Artsakh.” [Rrusastani kazm mtnelu hanrak’ven Arts’akhin gortsnakan ogut ch’i beri] (in Armenian). Civilnet, April 2, 2022. Accessed April 25, 2024. https://www.civilnet.am/news/656394/ռուսաստանի-կազմ-մտնելու-հանրաքվեն-արցախին-գործնական-օգուտ-չի-բերի/

Hajiyeva, Gunay. 2022. “President Aliyev Blames Armenia for Non-Implementation of Tripartite Statement.” Caspian News. July 17, 2022. Accessed April 25, 2024. https://caspiannews.com/news-detail/president-aliyev-blames-armenia-for-non-implementation-of-tripartite-statement-2022-7-17-0/.

Hoffman, Frank G. 2007. Conflict in the 21st Century: The Rise of Hybrid Wars. Arlington,. VA: Potomac Institute for Policy Studies.

International Court of Justice. 2023. “Application of the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (Armenia v. Azerbaijan): Request for the indication of provisional measures.” Summary 2023/1, February 22, 2023. Accessed April 25, 2024. https://www.icj-cij.org/sites/default/files/case-related/180/180-20230222-SUM-01-00-EN.pdf.

JAMnews. 2021. “Azerbaijan denies reports of soldier civilian in Nagorno-Karabakh, Moscow confirms the incident.” October 11, 2021. Accessed April 25, 2024. https://jam-news.net/azerbaijan-denies-reports-of-soldier-civilian-in-nagorno-karabakh-moscow-confirms-the-incident/.

Johnson, Robert. 2017. “The Evolution of Hybrid Threats Through History.” In: Shifting Paradigm of War: hybrid warfare, edited by Yücel Özel, and Ertan Inaltekin, 3-8. Istanbul: Turkish National Defense University Printing House.

Libiseller, Chiara. 2023. “‘Hybrid Warfare’ as an Academic Fashion.” Journal of Strategic Studies 46 (4): 858–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402390.2023.2177987.

MFA of the RF. 2021. “Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov’s remarks and answers to media questions at the Primakov Readings International Forum, via videoconference, Moscow, June 9, 2021.” Accessed April 25, 2024. https://archive.mid.ru/foreign_policy/news/-/asset_publisher/cKNonkJE02Bw/content/id/4779515?p_p_id=101_INSTANCE_cKNonkJE02Bw&_101_INSTANCE_cKNonkJE02Bw_languageId=en_GB.

Mianji, Jalaleddin Namini. 2020. “Turkey’s Approach Toward the 2020 Karabakh War.” Institute for Political and International Studies, November 17, 2020. Accessed April 25, 2024. https://www.ipis.ir/en/subjectview/617975/turkey’s-approach-toward-the-2020-karabakh-war

Murray, Williamson, and Peter R. Mansoor (eds.) 2012. Hybrid Warfare: Fighting Complex Opponents from the Ancient World to the Present. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139199254.

NEWS.am. 2020. “Artsakh: Hin Tagher and Khtsaberd villages heads say 10 people were captured from Armenian side.” Accessed April 25, 2024. https://news.am/eng/news/618867.html.

Nilsson, Niklas, Mikael Weissmann, Björn Palmertz, Per Thunholm, and Henrik Häggström. 2021. “Security challenges in the grey zone: Hybrid threats and hybrid warfare.” In: Hybrid Warfare: Security and Asymmetric Conflict in International Relations, edited by Mikael Weissmann , Niklas Nilsson , Björn Palmertz, and Per Thunholm, 1-18. London: I.B. Tauris. http://dx.doi.org/10.5040/9781788317795.0005.

OSCE. 2009. “Statement by the OSCE Minsk Group Co-Chair countries.” July 10, 2009. Accessed April 25, 2024. https://www.osce.org/mg/51152.

Poghosyan, Benyamin. 2022. “US Policy in the South Caucasus Prior to and After the 2020 Karabakh War in the Context of the Evolving Regional and International Geopolitics”. Journal of Political Science: Bulletin of Yerevan University 1 (3):36-50. https://doi.org/10.46991/JOPS/2022.1.3.036.

Prime Minister of the RA. 2020. “Statement by the Prime Minister of the Republic of Armenia, the President of the Republic of Azerbaijan and the President of the Russian Federation.” October 11, 2020. Accessed April 25, 2024. https://www.primeminister.am/en/press-release/item/2020/11/10/Announcement/.

Schmidt, Hans-Joachim. 2017. “The Four-Day War Has Diminished the Chances of Peace in Nagorno-Karabakh.” In: OSCE Yearbook 2016, edited by IFSH, 111-123. Baden-Baden. Accessed April 25, 2024. https://ifsh.de/file/publication/OSCE_Yearbook_en/2016/Schmidt-en.pdf.

The International Crisis Group. 2023. The Nagorno-Karabakh Conflict: A Visual Explainer.” September 16, 2023. Accessed April 25, 2024. https://www.crisisgroup.org/content/nagorno-karabakh-conflict-visual-explainer.

Vuković, Josipa, Dario Matika, and Slavko Barić. 2016. “Hybrid warfare challenges.” Security and Defence Quarterly 12 (3): 118-138. https://doi.org/10.35467/sdq/103239.

Weissmann, Mikael. 2021. “Conceptualizing and countering hybrid threats and hybrid warfare: The role of the military in the grey zone.” In: Hybrid Warfare Security and Asymmetric Conflict in International Relations, edited by Mikael Weissmann, Niklas Nilsson, Björn Palmertz, and Per Thunholm, 61-82. New Delhi: I. B. Tauris.

Wither, James K. 2016. “Making Sense of Hybrid Warfare.” Connections 15 (2): 73-87.

Wither, James K. 2020. “Defining hybrid warfare.” Per Concordiam 10 (1): 7-15.

Yildiz, Gültekin. 2017. “How Postmodern is Hybrid Warfare?: Revisiting the Modern Eurasian Military History.” In: Shifting Paradigm of War: hybrid warfare, edited by Yücel Özel, and Ertan Inaltekin, 23-30. Istanbul: Turkish National Defense University Printing House.

Downloads

Published

2024-09-09

How to Cite

Elamiryan, R. (2024). Transformation of Modern Wars in the South Caucasus: Azerbaijan’s Hybrid War Against Artsakh. Journal of Political Science: Bulletin of Yerevan University, 3(1(7), 10–23. https://doi.org/10.46991/JOPS/2024.3.7.010

Issue

Section

Regional Policy