CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK FOR TRAINING FUTURE TEACHERS BASED ON DOMINANT COGNITIVE STYLES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46991/educ-21st-century.v2i6.11147Keywords:
Keywords: future teachers, cognitive styles,Abstract
The article considers the main conceptual foundations of training future teachers based on dominant cognitive styles. The relevance of high-quality training of pedagogical personnel in accordance with changing needs and opportunities for social reality for the state and society as a whole is justified. The author addresses the question of the need to use the potential of individual characteristics of students – cognitive styles. Various interpretations of the concept of "cognitive style" from the point of view of various scientific fields, copyright approaches are considered. The main features of formation and manifestations of cognitive style in a person are described. The problem of taking into account only 1-2 diads of cognitive styles in the training process. At the same time, other styles are underestimated, and it is not realistic to take into account all known cognitive styles. They do not provide for the possibility of future teachers having a mixed style. In addition, there is a difficulty in the use of material by non-specialists in the field of psychology. These provisions indicate the rationality of accounting for cognitive metastyle "differential-integrality" in students. The article gives an essential characteristic of metastyle. The author points out that tasks should be both on the development of a dominant and subordinate cognitive style. Offers a description of possible job options for students with one or another dominant cognitive style. It is noted that this training organization avoids the problem of cognitive dissonance. Interacting in heterogeneous groups, future teachers learn the ability to organize productive joint activities, establish communication with representatives of different styles. The article discusses the rationality of a learning goal based on cognitive styles, and offers guidelines for its implementation. Its versatile action in didactic, psychological and social aspects is described.
References
Берулава Г. А. Стиль индивидуальности. Теория и практика. Чебоксары : Изд-во Чуваш. ун-та, 2001.
Берулава Г. А. Тест для диагностики когнитивного стиля «дифференциальность-интеграль-ность». Бийск : НИЦ БиГПИ, 1995.
Кондаков И. М. Психология: иллюстрированный словарь. СПб. : ПРАЙМ-ЕВРОЗНАК, 2007.
Лобанов А. П. Психология интеллекта и когнитивных стилей. Минск : Агентство А. Грев-цова, 2008.
Лятецкая И. Н. Реализация интедиффии в процессе подготовки педагогов на основе учета их когнитивных стилей // Психология личностного и профессионального развития субъектов непрерыв-ного образования : материалы XI Междунар. науч.-практ. конф. : Москва, 7–10 июля 2015 г. / Психологический институт РАО ; редкол. : Л.М. Митина [и др.]. М.; СПб., 2015. с. 355–359.
Моргун В. Ф. Интеграция и дифференциация образования: личностный и технологический аспекты // Школьные технологии. 2003. № 3. с. 3–9.
Невдах С. И., Лятецкая И. Н. Что такое интедиффия? // Мастерство online. 2015. № 2. Дата доступа : 19.06.2015. Режим доступа : http://ripo.unibel.by/index.php?id=774 –.
Педагогика. Современная энциклопедия; под общ. ред. А. П. Астахова. – Минск : Современная школа, 2010.
Холодная М. А. Когнитивная психология. Когнитивные стили. М. : Юрайт, 2020.
Холодная М. А. Когнитивные стили. О природе индивидуального ума. СПб. : Питер, 200
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.