The Use of the Armenian Stress. Directions of Linguistics and Levels of Language Analysis as a Context of Contestation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46991/BYSU:B/2024.15.3.123Keywords:
the opposition of language and speech, the use of stress, punctuation of the imperative mood, punctuation of vocatives, the relationship of linguistic levels, the social significance of the linguistic form, the pragmatic potential of stressAbstract
The article discusses the need to update the view on one of the important areas of linguistics - punctuation issues, using the example of the use of stress. The fact that the requirement of mandatory or often practically "voluntary-mandatory" stress is perplexing can be seen by familiarizing oneself with the arguments of a number of Armenian linguists, especially with the theories of many foreign linguists who have developed countless clarifying logics on issues related to language.
The subject of this article is the possible contribution of some modern linguistic theories in the use of stress, as well as in understanding the functions of punctuation in general. The statements of Armenian and foreign linguists considered in the article create a range of approaches, in comparison with which it is possible to discuss the rules of using punctuation marks and, in particular, stress.
The article is an attempt to highlight some landmarks from world linguistics that will help us be bolder in finding solutions to the actual problems of the Armenian language.
References
․ Ա․ Սարգսյան, Ընդհանուր և հայ լեզվաբանություն, 2018, էջ 337, http://language.sci.am/sites/default/files/book/girk_a.pdf
․ Է․ Աղայան (խմբ․), Ժամանակակից հայերեն խոսակցական լեզուն, ՀՍՍՀ ԳԱ, Հր․ Աճառյանի անվան լեզվի ինստիտուտ, Երևան, ՀՍՍՀ ԳԱ հրատ․, 1981։
․ Հ․ Բայադյան, Հարմարվողականության լեզուն, https://hetq.am/hy/article/21387։
․ Հ․ Բայադյան (խմբ․), Մեդիայի նշանագիտության ներածություն, Երևան, ԵՊՀ հրատ․, 2018։
․ Հ. Զաքարյան, Լ. Հովսեփյան, Ժամանակակից հայոց լեզու, 1983թ.։
․ Մ․ Կարապետյան, Հայերենի շեշտի գործածությունը։ Հայաստանյան լեզվաբանական ավանդույթները՝ որպես կետադրության համատեքստ, Բանբեր Երեւանի համալսարանի. Բանասիրություն, 2024, 2(44), էջ101-113
․ D․ D'Alfonso, The Dynamic Turn: On Syntax between Langue and Parole, Cahiers Ferdinand de Saussure, 62 (2009)․
E․ R․ Martínez, Delimiting Semantics and Pragmatics. a Functional, Structural Criterion, Atlantis , 18 (1996), No. 1/2․
․ J․ Åkerman, Indexicals and Reference-Shifting: Towards a Pragmatic Approach, https://philarchive.org/archive/KERIAR․
․ M․ E. Beckman, J․ J. Venditti, Tone and Intonation, in W․ J. Hardcastle (ed.), J. Laver (ed.), F. E. Gibbon (ed.), The Handbook of Phonetic Sciences, Oxford/Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, 2010․
․ M. B. Parkes, Pause and Effect: An Introduction to the History of Punctuation in the West, Cambridge, Scholar Press, 1992․
․ P. Eckert, Variation and the indexical field, Journal of Sociolinguistics 12/4, 2008, p. 453, https://web.stanford.edu/~eckert/PDF/IndexicalField.pdf․
․ R. Dale, The Role of Punctuation in Discourse Structure, Natural Language Understanding and Generation, Asilomar, 1991
․ R ․Tartakovsky , E. E. Cummings's Parentheses: Punctuation as Poetic Device, Style , Vol. 43, No. 2, Temporal Paradoxes in Fiction and Stylistics in American Literatures (Summer 2009)․
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Bulletin of Yerevan University
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.