Gender Attitudes Across Generations in Contemporary Armenian Society (Comparative Analysis)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46991/BYSU:F/2022.13.2.048Keywords:
Armenian society, gender attitudes, generational differences, post-Soviet transitionAbstract
Contemporary gender norms and attitudes in Armenia have been shaped by a complex interplay of pre-Soviet traditional culture, the legacy of the Soviet socialist modernization project, and the post-Soviet spread of western ideas and values. The paper examines generational differences in gender norms and attitudes in Armenian society, by comparing three generational groups. The mixed-method analysis is based on quantitative and qualitative data, including the nationally-representative household-based Gender Barometer Survey conducted in 2014, as well as in-depth interviews and focus group discussions among members of different generational groups in Armenia during 2015-2020. The results of the factor analysis show considerable generational complexity in gender norms and attitudes. We find that the majority of Armenian society, regardless of gender and generation, strongly adheres to the core family values and the corresponding gendered family roles. At the same time, the analyses show that individuals who belong to the older generation, i.e., the generation whose socialization took place under Soviet rule, display the most conservative patriarchal gender attitudes. The middle generation, whose coming of age occurred during the period of the early radical post-Soviet transformation, demonstrate inconsistent gender attitudes: while adhering to conservative gender norms, they are also most dissatisfied with the state of gender equality and in some aspects, such as achievement of status and wealth, display considerable gender egalitarianism. Finally, the youngest generation generally subscribes to the most egalitarian attitudes, but this group is far from homogenous, demonstrating a sharp divide between urban dwellers, who are very egalitarian-minded, and rural ones, who are remarkably conservative. Notably, young women living in cities display by far the most egalitarian attitudes. Moreover, among men, the generation is not a significant predictor of the level of egalitarianism in gender attitudes, compared to education and area of residence (city/village). However, it has a more significant impact on women’s perception of the traditional gender scheme. We conclude with a discussion of the role of changes in gender norms and attitudes in a broader transformation of Armenian society.
References
Astvatsaturov, S., & Marzpanyan, H. (2014). The Interrelation between Емigration, Human Capital Reproduction and Gender Risks in the Republic of Armenia. Journal of Sociology: Bulletin of Yerevan University, 5(2 (143), 3–12.
Chafetz, J.S. (1999). The handbook of the sociology of gender. New York, NY: Plenum Publishers.
Cohn I. S. (2002). History and Theory of "male studies". Gender kaleidoscope. Course of lectures. ed. M.M. Malysheva. M., p. 188-242. (in Russian).
Crespi I. (2004). Socialization and gender roles within the family: A study on adolescents and their parents in Great Britain. Milan, Italy: Department of Sociology, Catholic University of Milan.
World Bank (2001) .Engendering Development. Through Gender Equality in Rights, Resources and Voice. A World Bank Policy Research Report. The World Bank and Oxford University Press. Washington D.C.
Franklin, S. (Ed.). (1996). The sociology of gender. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing, Ltd.
Gevorgyan, M. (2020). Women in the Military Sphere: Some Issues of Social Adaptationilitary Sphere. Journal of Sociology: Bulletin of Yerevan University, 11(2 (32), 40–48.
Hamieh Ch.S., Usta J. (2011). The Effects of Socialization on Gender Discrimination and Violence, Oxfam GB Research Report, March 2011 GB.
Hibbard, D. R., Buhrmester, D. (1998). “The role of peers in the socialization of gender- related social interaction styles”. Sex Roles: A Journal of Research, 39, 3-4, 185.
Khasbulatova O. (2005). Russian gender policy in the XX century: Myths and Realities. Ivanovo: ISU. (in Russian).
Klecina I. (2004). Psychology of Gender Relations: Theory and Practice. SPb.: Aletheia. (in Russian).
Kroska, A. (2006). “Gender Ideology and Gender Role Ideology.” in Blackwell Encyclopedia of Sociology, edited by George Ritzer. Blackwell Publishing
Lorber J. (1994). Paradoxes of Gender. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Lorber, J. (2011). Gender Inequality: Feminist Theories and Politics, Oxford University Press.
Macmillan R., Kruttschnitt C. (2005). ‘Patterns of violence against women: risk factors and consequences’, National Criminal Justice Reference Service.
Macrae, C.N., Stangor, C., Hewstone, M. (1996). Stereotypes and stereotyping. New York: The Guilford Press.
Matthews, J. L. (2007). Hidden sexism: Facial prominence and its connections to gender and occupational status in popular print media. Sex Roles: A Journal of Research, 57, p. 515-525.
Matsumoto, D., Juang L. (2013). Culture and Psychology, 5th Edition. Wadsworth, Cengage Learning.
Maurer, T. W., & Pleck, J. H. (2006). Fathers’ caregiving and breadwinning: A gender congruence analysis. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 7(2), 101–112.
Narahara, May M. (1998). Gender Stereotypes in Children's Picture Books. 1998 Exit Project EDEL 570, University of California, Long Beach. 22p.
Phillips, S. J. (2013). Understanding gender role ideology and marital satisfaction in midwest caucasian baptist women. Walden University, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Pilcher, J. and I. Whelehan. (2004). 50 Key Concepts in Gender Studies, London: Sage Publications.
Ruxton, S. (2004). Gender Equality and Men: Learning from Practice, Oxford: Oxfam.
Shahnazaryan G. The Social Construction of Gender: macro and micro theories. Yerevan, Edit print, 2007 (in Armenian).
Stockard, J. (1999). Gender socialization. The hHandbook of the sociology of gender (Ed. J.S. Chaftez). New York, NY: Plenum Publishers, pp. 215-227.
Tartakovskaya I. (2003). "Failed masculinity" as a type of behavior in the labor market. Gender relations in modern Russia: the study of the 1990s. The collection of scientific articles (Eds.Popkova L., Tartakovskaya I.). Samara: Publishing House "Samara University", p. 42-70. (in Russian).
Tartakovskaya I. (1997). Sociology of gender and family. Samara: International Institute "Open Society". (in Russian).
Temkina A., Rotkirkh A. (2002). Soviet gender contracts and their transformation in Soviet Russia. Sociological studies. № 11. p. 4-15. (in Russian).
Tumanian H. (1991). A complete collection of works․Yerevan, vol.2, p. 107. (in Armenian).
Williams, J. Allen Jr.; Vernon, JoEtta; Williams, Martha C.; and Malecha, Karen, (1987). "Sex Role Socialization in Picture Books: An Update”. Sociology Department, Faculty Publications. Paper 8.
Witt, S. D. (2000). “The influence of television on children's gender role socialization”. Childhood Education, 76, 5, 322-4. Education Abstracts Full Text.
Wilcox, W. B., & Nock, S. L. (2007). What does love have to do with it? Equality, equity, commitment and women's marital quality. Social Forces, 84(3), 1321–1345.
Wharton, A. S. (2005). The sociology of gender: An introduction to theory and research. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
Zdravomyslova E., Temkina A. (1996). Introduction. The social construction of gender and gender system in Russia․ The gender dimension of social and political activity during the transitional period. Coll. Scien. Articles / Ed. E. Zdravomyslova and A. Temkina. Centre for Independent Social Research. Proceedings. Issue 4. SPb. (in Russian).
Zdravomyslova E., Temkina A. (2000). The Sociology of Gender Relations and Gender Approach in Sociology․ Sociological Research. № 11. M. p. 15-24. (in Russian).
Zdravomyslova E., Temkina A. (2002) Etacratic Soviet gender order․ Social History. 2002. Special edition on gender history (Ed. by N. Pushkareva). M.: ROSSPEN. (in Russian).
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Maria ZASLAVSKAYA, Victor AGADJANIAN
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
