The Contrastive Study of the Conjunction ‘and’ in English and Armenian

Authors

  • Anahit Hovhannisyan M. Nalbandyan State University of Shirak

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46991/TSTP/2021.1.1.28

Keywords:

contrastive study, coordinative conjunction (and), semantic range, pragmatic marker, stylistic device

Abstract

In linguistics the structuring role of conjunctions is emphasized, whereas its pragmatic and contrastive study is often foregrounded. Conjunction may be prerequisite for contrastive study.

The present research is mainly aimed at establishing semantic – functional characteristics of the conjunction “and”, as well as identifying its equivalents in Armenian translation. In other words only one translation direction is investigated, namely English to Armenian. The merit of this research lies in the fact that the study of conjunction from contrastive perspective reveals structural similarities and dissimilarities of the source language and the target language.

Contrastive study can be used to get new insights into syntax and the findings of this analysis can prove to be useful in such fields as comparative grammar, pragmatics, second-language teaching, etc.

Author Biography

Anahit Hovhannisyan, M. Nalbandyan State University of Shirak

D.Sc., Professor, Chairperson of the Department of English Language and Literature

References

Aarts, Bars. 2001. English Syntax and Argumentation. 2nd ed. New York: Palgrave.

Aidinlou, Nader Assadi, and Elnaz Reshadi. “A Comparative Study of the Use of Conjunctions and References in Electronic Mails vs. Paper- based Letters.” In Journal of Language Teaching and Research. Vol. 5, No. 3, pp. 611-615, 2014. Print.

Anward, Jan, Edith Moravcsik, and Leon Stassen. 1977. “Parts of Speech: A Challenge for Typology.” In Linguistic Typology 1, 167-183.

Ariel, Mira. 2008. Pragmatics and Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Blakemore, Diane, and Robin Carston. 1999. “The Pragmatics of ‘and’ Conjunctions. The Non-narrative Cases.” In UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 5, 277-298.

Chalker, Sylvia. 1996. Collins Cobuild English Guides 9: Linking Words. London: HarperCollins.

Halliday, M.A.K., and R. Hans. 1976. Cohesion in English. London: Longman.

Hertwig, Ralph, Björn Benz, and Stefan Krauss. 2008. The Conjunction Fallacy and the Many Meanings of ‘and.’ Elsevier Print, 97 Language Sciences.

Jeffries, Lesly. 2006. Discovering Language. New York: Palgrave. MacMillan.

Koshevaya, Irina. 1982. The Theory of English Grammar. Moscow: Prosvesheniye.

Leech, Geoffrey, and Jan Svartvik. 1994. A Communicative Grammar of English. London. New York: Longman.

Lehman, Ch. 1991. “Predicate Classes and Participation.” In Partizipation. Das sprachliche Erfassen von Sachverhalten, 183-239. Tübingen: G. Narr.

Leung, Carrie. 2005. A Comparison of the Use of Major English Conjunctions by American and Hong Kong University Students. Lund: Lund University Press.

Maugham, Somerset. 1937. The Theatre. New York: Doubleday, Doran.

Munday, Jeremy. 2001. Introducing Translation Studies. Theories and Applications. London/New York: Routledge.

Payne, John. 1985. “Complex Phrases and Complex Sentences.” In Language Typology and Syntactic Description. II. Complex Consturctions. (ed.) Shopen, 3-41. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Pons Bordería, Salvador. 2001. Connectives/Discourse Markers: An Overview. Quaderns de filologia. Estudis literaris. Vol. VI. 219-243.

Quirk, Charles Randolph, Wrenn, Charles Leslie. 1977. An Old English Grammar. London: Methuen’s Old English Library.

Schiffrin, Deborah. 1988. Discourse Markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Twain, Mark. 1997. The Prince and the Pauper. London: Penguin Classics.

Wilde, Oscar. 1891. The Picture of Dorian Grey. London: Penguin Classics.

Moem, Somerseth․1985. Thatron. Yerevan: "Sovetakan grogh" hratarakchuthyun.

Tven, Mark. 1980. Arqayazny yev aghqaty. Yerevan: "Sovetakan grogh" hratarakchuthyun.

Uayld, Oskar. 2012. Dorian Greyi dimankary. Yerevan: "Edith Print" hratarakchuthyun.

Aleksandrova, Ol'ga, Komova, Tat'yana. 1998. Sovremennyi Angliiskii Yazyk: Morfologiya i Sintaksis. Moscow: Izd. Akademiya.

Ivanova, I.P., Burlakova, V.V., Pocheptsov, G.G. 1981. Teoreticheskaya Grammatika Sovremennogo Angliiskogo Yazyka.Mowcow: Vysshaya Shkola.

Studiopedia.su. 2014. Notional and Functional Parts of Speech. https://studopedia.su/14_19874_Notional-and-functional-parts-of-speech.html.

Downloads

Published

2021-06-30

How to Cite

Hovhannisyan, A. . (2021). The Contrastive Study of the Conjunction ‘and’ in English and Armenian. Translation Studies: Theory and Practice, 1(1 (1), 19–28. https://doi.org/10.46991/TSTP/2021.1.1.28

Issue

Section

Articles